CSI on Trial

Season 1

6 episodes · Dec 21, 2022

0/6 watched

Swipe a row to mark watched · long-press to mark up to there

  • Blood Pattern Analysis
    S1E1

    Blood Pattern Analysis

    Dec 21, 202251m

    Based on expert testimony from bloodstain pattern analysts a jury convicted former state trooper David Camm of killing his family. He was exonerated years later when a shocking new piece of evidence came to light. How did bloodstain pattern analysis get it so wrong? Is it good science?

    Reviews
  • Bite Mark Analysis
    S1E2

    Bite Mark Analysis

    Dec 21, 202259m

    As a young sailor Keith Harward was convicted of a vicious assault based on bitemark analysis. After 33 years in prison DNA testing exonerated him and proved the bite evidence was junk. The bitemark analysis field has seen intense in-fighting and government investigations.

    Reviews
  • Firearm Examination
    S1E3

    Firearm Examination

    Dec 21, 202252m

    Firearms Analysis is one of the most common forensic science practices in the US but recently the science behind it has come under fire. The national battle over whether to allow firearms analysis evidence in court is not just theoretical.

    Reviews
  • Shaken Baby Syndrome
    S1E4

    Shaken Baby Syndrome

    Dec 21, 202251m

    Suburban mom Audrey Edmunds was convicted of shaking a neighbor’s baby to death. But she was freed after 11 years when the pathologist who testified against her admitted he was no longer sure about Shaken Baby Syndrome.

    Reviews
  • Footwear Analysis
    S1E5

    Footwear Analysis

    Dec 21, 202261m

    The shoe print at the grisly Idaho crime scene seemed to match Charles Fain’s shoe– both showed a small nail hole in the sole. Based on that physical evidence he was convicted and sentenced to death.

    Reviews
  • Arson Investigation
    S1E6

    Arson Investigation

    Dec 21, 202251m

    David Gavitt served almost 27 years in prison before new arson investigation science exonerated him. Anthony Kyles and countless others are still behind bars. What happens when the science behind crime scene investigations moves forward but legal precedent only looks backward?

    Reviews